Head to head
Triangulation or Gloomhaven
To help you decide
Why you'd pick each one
Triangulation
- Less well known, if you want something off the beaten track.
- Easier to teach and to get to the table: 1.0 vs 3.9 in weight.
- Plays in 15 minutes against 90.
- Handles up to 8 players.
- Brings team-based game and targeted clues, which the other one doesn't have.
- Works with younger players: 6+ against 14+.
Gloomhaven
- Better rated on BoardGameGeek: 8.5 vs 7.0.
- Far more played: 67,697 ratings against 239.
- Meatier, if you want something to chew on.
- Fills a long session, if you have the whole evening.
- Plays solo.
- Brings hand management and multi-use cards, which the other one doesn't have.
The numbers, side by side
| Data point | Triangulation | Gloomhaven |
|---|---|---|
| BGG rating | 7.0 | 8.5 Better rated |
| Ratings | 239 | 67,697 |
| Players | 3–8 | 1–4 |
| Playing time | 10–20 min | 60–120 min |
| Complexity | 1.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Age | 6+ | 14+ |
| Year | 2026 | 2017 |
Only the rating gets a winner mark. A shorter or lighter game isn't a better one: it depends on what you're after.
Ratings and catalogue data are attributed to BoardGameGeek.